Defending my caveman remarks

I was originally planning on putting some kind of proof behind my remarks, as to a boy looking more like his mother than his father. Unfortunately, like I say, trust and believe no one or anything you read! I could have swore I read something somewhere or heard something in biology class that backs my claim to this. I alas, after hours of searching through pages and pages of genetics jargon, gave up. Yes I am aware that parents give equal genetic material, but the quality is determined by dominant recessive bla bla bla....Daughters get XX while boys get Xy......That's all I got for now.

I did come across some research that baby's regardless of sex look more like their paternal fathers, as a kind of survival mechanism. A male is more likely to stay around and care for a baby that looks like him than one that doesn't. Goes back to the cave man times. Some shit like that. So my argument, which is a moot point in the previous post about the baby looking nothing like Matt, has no facts behind it all. Sorry for the misunderstanding

Just another reason why I love the interenet, facts and my fingure tips!